Help Gus Kramer Restore the Homeowner’s Exemption

The only law protecting California seniors and other property owner dollars against inflation and rising real estate prices is Proposition 13.

I work hard to fairly assess property taxes in Contra Costa County. You should not pay more than your house is worth, and the County should not demand more than the law permits. Some politicians hate me because I fight for what is right by you. To that end, I have been collaborating for several years to have the State of California increase the homeowner’s exemption from $7,000 a year to $100,000 a year minimum. This would give every homeowner almost a $1,000 a year reduction in their property taxes.

Here is why I believe that money belongs to you, and not the State. Prior to Prop 13 passing in 1978 the homeowner’s exemption was 25% of the assessed value. That also is an alternative to the $100,000 homeowner’s exemption being proposed. 

The state should have indexed the exemption in 1978 but they were greedy and did not.

I, and other assessors from around California, are working together to pass this exemption. If there was ever a time to help homeowners, this is the time. With inflation, increased values, and increases in interest rates, we all need to work together to make this happen.

There are two ways we can get the exemption increased. One way is to get a proposition on the ballot, as happened in 1978’s “Tax Revolt” that passed Prop 13. The other way is to have the State legislature vote and pass it.

This is where we all need to work together. If enough Californian’s write their representatives in Sacramento and urge them to pass a law indexing the exemption, it could pass as a law. 

Below I have written a draft of text you can share with your State reps. Feel free to change it up and use your own words. The most effective way to reach them, and really reach them, is to mail a letter. 

Let’s all let them know that fair is fair, and homeowners deserve this property tax break.

-Gus

Tell Sacramento to Restore the Homeowner’s Property Tax Exemption

<Your Full Name  – Full Address –  Phone Number/E-mail (optional)>

Date 1, 2022

Honorable <insert name here>

123 Address Street 

City Name, CA, ZIPCODE

Dear Senator/Assembly Member <insert name here>

I am writing to tell you about an important issue affecting homeowners in California, and urge you to take action and support it in Sacramento. The Homeowner’s Exemption was locked at $7,000 in 1978 and has not changed with the times. It is time to correct this.

Prior to Proposition 13 passing in 1978, the homeowner’s exemption was 25% of the assessed value. That also is an alternative to the $100,000 homeowner’s exemption being proposed. 

When they implemented the law, the state should have indexed the exemption in 1978 but they did not.

I am hopeful that you will work with your other legislators to put this issue to a vote, and to correct the error of 1978 and restore the homeowner’s exemption to its original equity.

In this time of inflation, increased home values, and increases in interest rates, we all need to work together to finally properly adjust the homeowner’s exemption.

Sincerely, 

<Your Name>

Homeowner/Taxpayer/Voter

Lower taxes? Yes I Did.

I have received a few messages asking how I, as the County Assessor, can take responsibility for lower taxes. Most politicians want MORE of your hard earned money. The county supervisors can raise your fees for services and then vote themselves a raise. My job is different.

My job is to fairly assess property values. I have fiscal responsibility and professional obligations to be fair. If you think your house is overvalued and property tax too high, the Assessor office will review it.

Over 34,598 houses qualified for a decline in assessed value and lower property tax bills in 2018 alone.

Tough economic times requires everyone to work harder, and smarter, including your local government. It is the job of the Assessor to keep the local politicians from over-reaching into your wallet.

If you have any questions for me, send me an email guskramerassessor@gmail. com or give me a call 925-372-6136

A Message from Gus Kramer, Your Assessor

Assessor Gus Kramer photo

Public Service Announcement Regarding Your Property Taxes
• Help us provide you with the best service possible and help you avoid interest and penalties, please remember to pay your first installment of your property taxes on or before Monday, April 11, 2022.
• If you have questions about how to pay your property taxes, visit the Contra Costa County Tax Collector’s website at www.cctax.us or call their office at (925) 608-9500. (Corrected w/new phone number). The Tax Collector’s Office is located at 625 Court Street, Ste. 100, Martinez.
• If you have any questions about the taxable value of your home, please take the opportunity to call us at the Contra Costa County Assessor’s Office at (925) 313-7400. You are also welcomed to visit our website at
www.contracosta.ca.gov/assessor or visit us in person at 2530 Arnold Dr., Ste. 100, Martinez. We are open to the public between 9AM to 4PM Monday through Friday and we look forward to helping you with your property value questions.

Gus Kramer
County Assessor

Kramer slams East Bay Times

Dear Editors of the Bay Area News Group / East Bay Times:

I am writing to request that the East Bay Times retract the following libelous statements from the April 28, 2021, “Assessor Seeks $350,000 to Cover His Legal Fees in Misconduct Case”:

“Separate findings by a civil grand jury and a county-hired independent investigator that he had indeed harassed his employees led to a civil trial last year that would have seen Kramer removed from office.”

The Grand Jury did not make findings.  It made allegations, which are different from findings in that findings are substantiated, allegations are not.

The county-hired independent investigator did not find that Gus Kramer had harassed employees. In fact, the Bay Area news group retracted a similar statement in October 2018 because this is simply not true.  Reprinting this false statement with actual knowledge that it is false is malicious.

“Contra Costa County paid a $1 million settlement in 2009 to a former employee who alleged similar inappropriate behavior by Kramer.”  

There was no $1 million settlement by the county with a former employee in 2009. The employee in fact received $275,000 settlement for which the County was responsible because of its personnel policies and $595,000 for attorney’s fees for which the County was also responsible. There was an additional $10,000 charge against Mr. Kramer, which the County paid for him.

-Gus Kramer